Bangkok Post (26 November 2007)
Five groups to bid on B2.6bn ASON projectFive groups of companies have shown interest in bidding for CAT Telecom's 2.6-billion-baht automatically switched optical network (ASON), a board director has disclosed.
Five groups to bid on B2.6bn ASON projectFive groups of companies have shown interest in bidding for CAT Telecom's 2.6-billion-baht automatically switched optical network (ASON), a board director has disclosed.
He said the deadline allowing interested companies to buy bidding documents passed last Thursday, and five consortiums had bought the documents. They were required to submit their proposals to CAT by Dec 20.
Of the five groups of companies that bought documents, he said, four were earlier qualified to enter the bid. They included Ericsson, Jasmine, Marubeni and NEC.
The newcomer in this latest bidding round was Huawei/Loxley, he said.
Earlier Huawei/Loxley was disqualified because it could not meet the performance value requirement, which stated that qualified bidder must have completed a project worth about 390 million baht, or 15% of the project value.
However, the board later eased some bidding terms, lowering the performance value to 10% or 200 million baht, to enable more companies to compete in the bid.
But as the deadline to buy bidding documents expired last Thursday, only Huawei/Loxley bought the documents. No other new companies showed an interest in buying the documents.
The director noted that one director AM Piriya Siriboon, who disagreed with the decision to ease the bidding terms, did not attend the board meeting at which the requirements were relaxed. AM Piriya had earlier said that companies must have successfully completed a project worth at least 390 million baht, or 15% of the project value, to qualify for the bid.
The board's decision was made in part because some bidders complained that the requirements disqualified them.
But other bidders saw the 15% condition as fair and suitable since the ASON project is significant to the state agency. Changes to the bidding terms would only confuse bidders and unnecessarily delay the project, they said.